National highways Authority of India through its Project Director PIU Aurangabad Ravindra S Ingole vs Jivan Ramkrushna Shinde — 182/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010017382025

Arguments

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2025

Filing Number

1008/2025

Filing Date

09-05-2025

Registration No

182/2025

Registration Date

09-05-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34

Petitioner(s)

National highways Authority of India through its Project Director PIU Aurangabad Ravindra S Ingole

Adv. DESHPANDE AMIT SHRIKANT

Respondent(s)

Jivan Ramkrushna Shinde

Kailas Ramkrushna Shinde

Vilas Ramkrushna Shinde

Bharat Parmeshwar Shinde

Anurath aliyas Aniruddha Parmeshwar Shinde

Chhatranhuj Sitaram Shinde Died 6.

Popat Chhatrabhuj Shinde 6.

Ramesh Chhatrabhuj Shinde

The Competent Authority Land Acquisition Deputy Collector Beed

The Additional Collector Sole Arbitrator Beed

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

12-03-2026

Arguments

12-12-2025

Arguments

12-11-2025

Arguments

15-10-2025

Arguments

06-10-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

16-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary NHAI's Section 34 application was allowed conditionally. The District Court at Beed directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the arbitral award compensation (Rs. 1917/- per sq. meter for land acquired for National Highway widening) with the Executing Court within two weeks, after which respondents could withdraw the amount unconditionally. The court relied on the Supreme Court's precedent in Saraswatibai Chandrakant Shinde case rather than the Allahabad High Court judgment cited by NHAI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary NHAI's Section 34 application was allowed conditionally. The District Court at Beed directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the arbitral award compensation (Rs. 1917/- per sq. meter for land acquired for National Highway widening) with the Executing Court within two weeks, after which respondents could withdraw the amount unconditionally. The court relied on the Supreme Court's precedent in Saraswatibai Chandrakant Shinde case rather than the Allahabad High Court judgment cited by NHAI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case