STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Vitthal Dnyandeo Jadhav — 93/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409,120B. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHBI010016772025

Charge

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

763/2025

Filing Date

08-05-2025

Registration No

93/2025

Registration Date

09-05-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

FIR Details

FIR Number

129

Police Station

City Police Station Beed

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,406,409,120B
Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Respondent(s)

Vitthal Dnyandeo Jadhav

Shivaji Nivrutti Khod

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.

28-04-2026

Charge

12-03-2026

Charge

18-12-2025

Charge

05-11-2025

Charge

11-07-2025

Charge

Interim Orders

08-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The bail application of Shivaji Khod (accused No. 2) in a financial fraud case was allowed. The court found that while main allegations were against co-accused persons, the police papers did not prima facie show the applicant's direct involvement in inducing depositors or participating in day-to-day society affairs, with no recovery from him and investigation completed. He was released on bail with a personal bond and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court attendance, and furnishing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The bail application of Shivaji Khod (accused No. 2) in a financial fraud case was allowed. The court found that while main allegations were against co-accused persons, the police papers did not prima facie show the applicant's direct involvement in inducing depositors or participating in day-to-day society affairs, with no recovery from him and investigation completed. He was released on bail with a personal bond and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court attendance, and furnishing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case