STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Vitthal Dnyandeo Jadhav — 93/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409,120B. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHBI010016772025
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
763/2025
Filing Date
08-05-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
City Police Station Beed
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Respondent(s)
Vitthal Dnyandeo Jadhav
Shivaji Nivrutti Khod
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST.JUDGE-2 ADDL.SESSSIONS JUDGE,BEED.
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Charge |
| 12-03-2026 | Charge |
| 18-12-2025 | Charge |
| 05-11-2025 | Charge |
| 11-07-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Shivaji Khod (accused No. 2) in a financial fraud case was allowed. The court found that while main allegations were against co-accused persons, the police papers did not prima facie show the applicant's direct involvement in inducing depositors or participating in day-to-day society affairs, with no recovery from him and investigation completed. He was released on bail with a personal bond and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court attendance, and furnishing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Shivaji Khod (accused No. 2) in a financial fraud case was allowed. The court found that while main allegations were against co-accused persons, the police papers did not prima facie show the applicant's direct involvement in inducing depositors or participating in day-to-day society affairs, with no recovery from him and investigation completed. He was released on bail with a personal bond and surety of Rs. 30,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, court attendance, and furnishing residential proofs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts