The National Highways Authority Of India vs Bhushan Mohan Zodge Advocate - Nannaware S.M. — 200/2024
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHBI010014812024
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
783/2024
Filing Date
03-05-2024
Registration No
200/2024
Registration Date
22-06-2024
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The National Highways Authority Of India
Adv. Deshmukh Raghuraj V.
Respondent(s)
Bhushan Mohan Zodge Advocate - Nannaware S.M.
The Competent Authority Land Acquisition Dy Collector
The Learned Additional Collector Sole Arbitrator Beed
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-12-2025 | Arguments |
| 12-11-2025 | Arguments |
| 01-11-2025 | Arguments |
| 29-09-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The District Court at Beed allowed the application filed by the National Highways Authority of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court stayed the execution proceedings (bearing No. 454/2024) pending before the 8th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Beed, until the disposal of the arbitration application. The stay was granted after considering that the applicant had deposited 50% of the decretal amount before the executing court, and the application was expected to be disposed of within one to two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The District Court at Beed allowed the application filed by the National Highways Authority of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court stayed the execution proceedings (bearing No. 454/2024) pending before the 8th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Beed, until the disposal of the arbitration application. The stay was granted after considering that the applicant had deposited 50% of the decretal amount before the executing court, and the application was expected to be disposed of within one to two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts