The National Highways Authority Of India vs Bhushan Mohan Zodge Advocate - Nannaware S.M. — 200/2024

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010014812024

Arguments

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

783/2024

Filing Date

03-05-2024

Registration No

200/2024

Registration Date

22-06-2024

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section 34

Petitioner(s)

The National Highways Authority Of India

Adv. Deshmukh Raghuraj V.

Respondent(s)

Bhushan Mohan Zodge Advocate - Nannaware S.M.

The Competent Authority Land Acquisition Dy Collector

The Learned Additional Collector Sole Arbitrator Beed

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

12-03-2026

Arguments

12-12-2025

Arguments

12-11-2025

Arguments

01-11-2025

Arguments

29-09-2025

Arguments

Interim Orders

12-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The District Court at Beed allowed the application filed by the National Highways Authority of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court stayed the execution proceedings (bearing No. 454/2024) pending before the 8th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Beed, until the disposal of the arbitration application. The stay was granted after considering that the applicant had deposited 50% of the decretal amount before the executing court, and the application was expected to be disposed of within one to two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The District Court at Beed allowed the application filed by the National Highways Authority of India under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court stayed the execution proceedings (bearing No. 454/2024) pending before the 8th Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Beed, until the disposal of the arbitration application. The stay was granted after considering that the applicant had deposited 50% of the decretal amount before the executing court, and the application was expected to be disposed of within one to two months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case