Raosaheb Eknath Bangar vs Baban Eknath Bangar Advocate - Sabale N.N. — 74/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S.96. Status: Payment of Paper Book Charges. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHBI010014142025

Payment of Paper Book Charges

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2025

Filing Number

790/2025

Filing Date

22-04-2025

Registration No

74/2025

Registration Date

23-04-2025

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section S.96

Petitioner(s)

Raosaheb Eknath Bangar

Adv. Prashant Rajapurkar

Nanabhau Eknath Bangar

Adv. Prashant Rajapurkar

Sojarbai Raosaheb Bangar

Adv. Prashant Rajapurkar

Manisha Nanabhau Bangar

Adv. Prashant Rajapurkar

Bhamabai Eknath Bangar

Adv. Prashant Rajapurkar

Respondent(s)

Baban Eknath Bangar Advocate - Sabale N.N.

Ranjana Arjun Dhaytadak

Sakhar Ajinath Gitte

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

30-04-2026

Payment of Paper Book Charges

07-04-2026

Ex-Parte Order

12-03-2026

Appearance

16-02-2026

Appearance

27-01-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

15-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The District Court at Beed partly allowed the application and stayed the execution of the judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 331/2020 (a partition suit) until disposal of the appeal, considering that a related Writ Petition is pending before the High Court and disputed issues remain regarding property ownership. The trial court was directed to be informed of this stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court at Beed partly allowed the application and stayed the execution of the judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 331/2020 (a partition suit) until disposal of the appeal, considering that a related Writ Petition is pending before the High Court and disputed issues remain regarding property ownership. The trial court was directed to be informed of this stay order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case