STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Shital Pandurang Chavan Advocate - Sanap V.S. — 30/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010009812023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
252/2023
Filing Date
20-02-2023
Registration No
30/2023
Registration Date
20-02-2023
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
12-DIST.JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, BEED.
FIR Details
FIR Number
551
Police Station
Georai Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Rakh A.D.
Respondent(s)
Shital Pandurang Chavan Advocate - Sanap V.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 12-DIST.JUDGE-1 ADDL.SESSIONS JUDGE, BEED.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Vivo mobile handset was allowed. Vitthal Rajabhau Chavhan, the owner, was granted interim custody upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,000, with conditions that he cannot change the handset's color/nature, must produce it as directed during trial, and cannot transfer ownership until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for interim custody of a seized Vivo mobile handset was allowed. Vitthal Rajabhau Chavhan, the owner, was granted interim custody upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 10,000, with conditions that he cannot change the handset's color/nature, must produce it as directed during trial, and cannot transfer ownership until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts