ANURATH MALHARI DARADE vs STATE OF MAHARASHATRA Advocate - Rakh B.S. — 29/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010005292026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

263/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

Decision Date

20-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANURATH MALHARI DARADE

    Adv. mukund kulkarni

  2. 2.SUNANDA ANURATH DARADE

    Adv. mukund kulkarni

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA Advocate - Rakh B.S.

  2. 2.PAPESH PRALHAD BADE

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

  3. 3.VANITA PAPESH BADE

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

  4. 4.VETAL SUKHADEV KEKAN

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

  5. 5.PRALHAD UTTAM BADE

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

  6. 6.SANJIVANI PRALHAD BADE

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

  7. 7.BHAUSAHEB MALHARI DARADE

    Adv. Rajapurkar P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court at Beed partially allowed the application for case transfer under Section 448 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court consolidated two IPC cases (RCC Nos. 462/2024 and 467/2024) arising from the same incident on 06/05/2024 to be tried together before one court to avoid conflicting decisions. However, the court rejected consolidation of the two Negotiable Instruments Act cases (SCC Nos. 809/2024 and 810/2024) with the IPC cases, noting they arise from different causes of action, but consolidated the two NI Act cases under one court to prevent conflicting judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  4. 16-May-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  5. 13-May-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  6. 06-May-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  7. 02-May-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  8. 29-Apr-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  9. 13-Apr-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  10. 27-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  11. 12-Mar-2026

    Ex-Parte Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court at Beed partially allowed the application for case transfer under Section 448 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court consolidated two IPC cases (RCC Nos. 462/2024 and 467/2024) arising from the same incident on 06/05/2024 to be tried together before one court to avoid conflicting decisions. However, the court rejected consolidation of the two Negotiable Instruments Act cases (SCC Nos. 809/2024 and 810/2024) with the IPC cases, noting they arise from different causes of action, but consolidated the two NI Act cases under one court to prevent conflicting judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case