MINESH BALIRAM RAUT vs SURYATEJ ARBAN CO OF CREDIT SOCITY LTD Advocate - Shirsat R.B. — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 02nd May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010004552026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

Decision Date

02nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

MINESH BALIRAM RAUT

Adv. Yogesh Shelke

Respondent(s)

SURYATEJ ARBAN CO OF CREDIT SOCITY LTD Advocate - Shirsat R.B.

STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.

02-05-2026

Disposed

30-04-2026

Order

22-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

04-04-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

02-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Sessions Court at Beed rejected the accused's application for transfer of a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case, finding no merit in his claims of judicial bias. The court noted that the accused had repeatedly failed to attend hearings despite multiple summons and warrants being issued over 1.5 years, demonstrating negligence rather than justified concern about receiving fair treatment from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court at Beed rejected the accused's application for transfer of a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case, finding no merit in his claims of judicial bias. The court noted that the accused had repeatedly failed to attend hearings despite multiple summons and warrants being issued over 1.5 years, demonstrating negligence rather than justified concern about receiving fair treatment from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Court , Beed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case