MINESH BALIRAM RAUT vs SURYATEJ ARBAN CO OF CREDIT SOCITY LTD Advocate - Shirsat R.B. — 22/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHBI010004552026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

22/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Court , Beed

Judge

1-Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MINESH BALIRAM RAUT

    Adv. Yogesh Shelke

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURYATEJ ARBAN CO OF CREDIT SOCITY LTD Advocate - Shirsat R.B.

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Court at Beed rejected the accused's application for transfer of a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case, finding no merit in his claims of judicial bias. The court noted that the accused had repeatedly failed to attend hearings despite multiple summons and warrants being issued over 1.5 years, demonstrating negligence rather than justified concern about receiving fair treatment from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Order

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  8. 31-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.

  11. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court at Beed rejected the accused's application for transfer of a Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act case, finding no merit in his claims of judicial bias. The court noted that the accused had repeatedly failed to attend hearings despite multiple summons and warrants being issued over 1.5 years, demonstrating negligence rather than justified concern about receiving fair treatment from the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case