STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Mukesh Balu Adagale Advocate - Sanap V.S. — 17/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,523,506,307. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010004032022
Filing Number
135/2022
Filing Date
27-Jan-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
28-Jan-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
650
Police Station
Shivajinagar P.S. Beed.
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Tandale A.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mukesh Balu Adagale Advocate - Sanap V.S.
-
2.Anikesh Suresh Rakh
-
3.Avinash Machindra Nagare
-
4.Vishwajit Bhagwat Nagare
-
5.Rutupurna Bharat Nagare
-
6.Rupsing Sardarsing Tak
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Beed acquitted all six accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, attempt to murder, and arms violations, as the prosecution's key witness (the informant) retracted his statements and denied both the incident and the accused's involvement. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
24-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
15-Dec-2025
List of Witness
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
15-Oct-2025
Charge
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
23-Sep-2025
Charge
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
29-Jul-2025
Charge
Prin.dist. And Sess.judge/Chairman MACT Beed.
-
19-Jun-2025
Charge
Distjudge-3 and Asst Sessions Judge Beed
-
30-Apr-2025
Charge
Distjudge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Beed
-
10-Oct-2024
Charge
Distjudge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Beed
-
18-Jul-2024
Charge
Distjudge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Beed
-
10-Jul-2024
Charge
Distjudge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Beed
-
01-Jul-2024
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
04-May-2024
Charge
Distjudge-4 and Addl Sessions Judge Beed
-
07-Mar-2024
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
13-Feb-2024
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
18-Jan-2024
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
14-Dec-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
01-Nov-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
06-Oct-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
11-Sep-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
05-Jul-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
19-May-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
22-Feb-2023
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
17-Dec-2022
Charge
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
28-Nov-2022
N.B.W._Unready
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
06-Oct-2022
N.B.W._Unready
District Judge-5 And Addl.sessions Judge Beed
-
27-Jul-2022
Charge
Dj-6 And Addl.sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Beed
-
28-Apr-2022
Charge
Dj-5 And Addl.sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Beed
-
22-Feb-2022
Filing of Surety
Dj-5 And Addl.sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Beed
-
28-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2022
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Beed acquitted all six accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, attempt to murder, and arms violations, as the prosecution's key witness (the informant) retracted his statements and denied both the incident and the accused's involvement. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts