STATE OF MAHARASHATRA vs Mukesh Balu Adagale Advocate - Sanap V.S. — 17/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,523,506,307. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHBI010004032022
Filing Number
135/2022
Filing Date
27-01-2022
Registration No
17/2022
Registration Date
28-01-2022
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
650
Police Station
Shivajinagar P.S. Beed.
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHATRA
Adv. Tandale A.S.
Respondent(s)
Mukesh Balu Adagale Advocate - Sanap V.S.
Anikesh Suresh Rakh
Avinash Machindra Nagare
Vishwajit Bhagwat Nagare
Rutupurna Bharat Nagare
Rupsing Sardarsing Tak
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Beed acquitted all six accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, attempt to murder, and arms violations, as the prosecution's key witness (the informant) retracted his statements and denied both the incident and the accused's involvement. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Beed acquitted all six accused persons of charges including unlawful assembly, rioting, attempt to murder, and arms violations, as the prosecution's key witness (the informant) retracted his statements and denied both the incident and the accused's involvement. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 235(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts