Shivaji Bapurao Kharad vs Raosaheb Rambhau Kharad Advocate - Rakh S.B. — 19/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHBI010003242025
Filing Number
150/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
District and Sessions Court , Beed
Judge
1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Bapurao Kharad
Adv. Shinde G.M.
Sakharam Santram Kolekar
Ram Laxman Kolekar
Sambhaji Bapurao Kharad
Respondent(s)
Raosaheb Rambhau Kharad Advocate - Rakh S.B.
Bhimrao Ramrao Kharad
Natha Ramrao Kharad
Pralhad Parasram Kharad
Khandu Ramrao Panjarkar
Taramati Gitaram Kharad
Laxman Mahadu Bhosale
Tukaram Prabhu Vaykar
Kundlik Kashinath Limbkar
Mahadev Ganpati Vaykar
Madhukar Bapurao Kharad
Sudhakar Bapurao Kharad
Sanjivani Bhausaheb Aher
Meenabai Tanhaji Kharad
Baban Appasaheb Jungahare
Sidheshwar Ramchandra Vaykar
Madhu Jija Andhare
Ramdas Ramchandra Vaykar
Bapurao Atmaram Kharad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRIN.DIST. AND SESS.JUDGE/CHAIRMAN MACT BEED.
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 24-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Court at Beed allowed the appellants' civil appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a fresh land measurement. The court found that the original measurement was conducted without serving notices to defendants 17-19 and 21, violating natural justice principles and prejudicing their rights to contest the measurement. The trial court's judgment based on this flawed measurement was accordingly quashed and the matter sent back for remeasurement in the presence of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District Court at Beed allowed the appellants' civil appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a fresh land measurement. The court found that the original measurement was conducted without serving notices to defendants 17-19 and 21, violating natural justice principles and prejudicing their rights to contest the measurement. The trial court's judgment based on this flawed measurement was accordingly quashed and the matter sent back for remeasurement in the presence of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts