State of Maharashtra vs Balaji Hiralal Gadhe Advocate - Murkute J.M., Khandagale D.A., Khandagale D.A.null, — 318/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,326,504,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAU170011672025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
525/2025
Filing Date
06-07-2024
Registration No
318/2025
Registration Date
06-07-2024
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
PAITHAN
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Balaji Hiralal Gadhe Advocate - Murkute J.M., Khandagale D.A., Khandagale D.A.null,
Datta Balaji Gadhe
Rajesh Hiralal Gadhe
Govind Hiralal Gadhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Balaji Hiralal Gadhe (Session Case No. 318/2025) Accused No. 4's bail application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Paithan. The accused faced charges under IPC sections 307, 504, 506 (read with 34) and Arms Act sections 4 & 25 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his son with a stick during a land dispute over ancestral agricultural property. The court found serious nature of offences, specific allegations in the FIR, and risk of evidence tampering/absconding, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Balaji Hiralal Gadhe (Session Case No. 318/2025) Accused No. 4's bail application was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Paithan. The accused faced charges under IPC sections 307, 504, 506 (read with 34) and Arms Act sections 4 & 25 for allegedly assaulting an informant and his son with a stick during a land dispute over ancestral agricultural property. The court found serious nature of offences, specific allegations in the FIR, and risk of evidence tampering/absconding, thus denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts