Nandabai laxman magare vs Devidas suryabhan gund Advocate - Sabu P.S. — 15/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 02nd May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU170006962025
Filing Number
441/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2024
Registration No
15/2025
Registration Date
23-10-2024
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nandabai laxman magare
Adv. Gawade Y.E.
Laxman Ramji Magare
Adv. Gawade Y.E.
Raju Laxman Magare
Adv. Gawade Y.E.
Anita Yogesh Bhavar
Adv. Gawade Y.E.
Respondent(s)
Devidas suryabhan gund Advocate - Sabu P.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 23-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District Court of Paithan allowed the petitioners' application to condone a delay of 5 years, 4 months, and 26 days in filing an appeal, finding that the delay was caused by their advocate's failure to inform them of the judgment and decree. The court accepted the petitioners' explanation and held that parties cannot suffer due to advocate negligence, ordering the respondent be compensated with Rs. 5,000 in costs, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District Court of Paithan allowed the petitioners' application to condone a delay of 5 years, 4 months, and 26 days in filing an appeal, finding that the delay was caused by their advocate's failure to inform them of the judgment and decree. The court accepted the petitioners' explanation and held that parties cannot suffer due to advocate negligence, ordering the respondent be compensated with Rs. 5,000 in costs, after which the appeal would be registered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts