State of Maharashtra vs Shahajan Chhotumiya Shaha Advocate - Bangar A.S. — 135/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAU170006942025
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
255/2025
Filing Date
09-11-2022
Registration No
135/2025
Registration Date
09-11-2022
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
MIDC PAITHAN
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Bagul A.P.
Respondent(s)
Shahajan Chhotumiya Shaha Advocate - Bangar A.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 14-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case 135/2025 Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 CrPC to recall Prosecution Witness No. 8 (investigating officer Bhagwat Tikaram Nagargoje). Despite the accused's objection that sufficient opportunity had already been granted, the court found that critical documents (medical officer's reply, CDR, and SDR) necessary for just decision were not on record when evidence was closed on 07.02.2025, and therefore PW 8's recall was warranted. A witness summon was issued accordingly on 05.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 135/2025 Summary: The court allowed the prosecution's application under Section 311 CrPC to recall Prosecution Witness No. 8 (investigating officer Bhagwat Tikaram Nagargoje). Despite the accused's objection that sufficient opportunity had already been granted, the court found that critical documents (medical officer's reply, CDR, and SDR) necessary for just decision were not on record when evidence was closed on 07.02.2025, and therefore PW 8's recall was warranted. A witness summon was issued accordingly on 05.06.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts