Vaibhav Vardhaman Kala vs State of Maharashtra — 50/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 28th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170002152026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
115/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
382
Police Station
PACHOD
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaibhav Vardhaman Kala
Adv. Shaikh Mateen Patel
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 50/2026 Court: Additional Sessions Judge, Paithan, Aurangabad Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to Vaibhav Vardhaman Kala. The applicant must execute a personal recognizance (P.R) bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety in the same amount, and attend court proceedings as required. Key Reasoning: The applicant appeared before the Magistrate in response to summons but absented himself from the afternoon session due to misconception that the Magistrate could remand him to custody in a case triable by the Court of Session. The Magistrate issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) without forwarding the victim's custody application to the Court of Session as mandated by Section 232(2) of BNSS. Since the applicant had reasonable apprehension of arrest and appeared voluntarily initially, the court protected his liberty by granting anticipatory bail pending case commitment to the Sessions Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 50/2026 Court: Additional Sessions Judge, Paithan, Aurangabad Decision: The court granted anticipatory bail to Vaibhav Vardhaman Kala. The applicant must execute a personal recognizance (P.R) bond of Rs. 15,000 with surety in the same amount, and attend court proceedings as required. Key Reasoning: The applicant appeared before the Magistrate in response to summons but absented himself from the afternoon session due to misconception that the Magistrate could remand him to custody in a case triable by the Court of Session. The Magistrate issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) without forwarding the victim's custody application to the Court of Session as mandated by Section 232(2) of BNSS. Since the applicant had reasonable apprehension of arrest and appeared voluntarily initially, the court protected his liberty by granting anticipatory bail pending case commitment to the Sessions Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts