Ashpak Yunus Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra — 46/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,308(5),115,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001942026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
468
Police Station
PAITHAN
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashpak Yunus Shaikh
Adv. Najan U.N.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Order |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ashpak Yunus Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra (46/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected the bail application of Ashpak Yunus Shaikh, who was accused of armed extortion and attempted murder at a milk dairy. The court found that the applicant and co-accused entered with a sword and iron rod, demanded Rs. 1,000 with threats to kill, and assaulted the informant causing injuries to his left forearm and right knee. Citing the gravity of the offense (Section 109 BNS—attempted murder with life imprisonment penalty), the applicant's extensive criminal history (7 prior cases including violent crimes), and risk of witness tampering, the judge denied bail despite investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ashpak Yunus Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra (46/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected the bail application of Ashpak Yunus Shaikh, who was accused of armed extortion and attempted murder at a milk dairy. The court found that the applicant and co-accused entered with a sword and iron rod, demanded Rs. 1,000 with threats to kill, and assaulted the informant causing injuries to his left forearm and right knee. Citing the gravity of the offense (Section 109 BNS—attempted murder with life imprisonment penalty), the applicant's extensive criminal history (7 prior cases including violent crimes), and risk of witness tampering, the judge denied bail despite investigation completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts