Santosh Dnyandev Gavali vs State of Maharashtra — 41/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001772026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
100/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
MIDC PAITHAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Dnyandev Gavali
Adv. Gavali P.N.
Shubham Santosh Gavali
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 41/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Santosh Dnyandev Gavali and Shubham Santosh Gavali under Section 482 BNS 2023. The applicants were accused of assaulting an informant and snatching Rs. 2,000, and jointly assaulting another person with an axe. The court found that CCTV footage corroborated the allegations, custodial interrogation was necessary for weapon and cash recovery, and the applicants' prior criminal history weighed against granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 41/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Santosh Dnyandev Gavali and Shubham Santosh Gavali under Section 482 BNS 2023. The applicants were accused of assaulting an informant and snatching Rs. 2,000, and jointly assaulting another person with an axe. The court found that CCTV footage corroborated the allegations, custodial interrogation was necessary for weapon and cash recovery, and the applicants' prior criminal history weighed against granting bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts