Abhishek Ashok Dhas vs State of Maharashtra — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001762026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
99/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
353
Police Station
PAITHAN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abhishek Ashok Dhas
Adv. Babar R.C.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Abhishek Ashok Dhas v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Abhishek Dhas's second bail application in a fatal road accident case. Dhas was charged under BNS Sections 105, 106(1), 281, 125(a), 125(b), and Motor Vehicles Act sections for rash and negligent driving that caused the deaths of two motorcycle riders. The court found the allegations prima facie credible based on CCTV footage showing high-speed driving and the applicant recording his speedometer while driving. The judge emphasized that Dhas fled the accident scene and refused bail due to the offense's gravity, the severity of potential punishment (10 years imprisonment), and his culpable conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Abhishek Ashok Dhas v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Abhishek Dhas's second bail application in a fatal road accident case. Dhas was charged under BNS Sections 105, 106(1), 281, 125(a), 125(b), and Motor Vehicles Act sections for rash and negligent driving that caused the deaths of two motorcycle riders. The court found the allegations prima facie credible based on CCTV footage showing high-speed driving and the applicant recording his speedometer while driving. The judge emphasized that Dhas fled the accident scene and refused bail due to the offense's gravity, the severity of potential punishment (10 years imprisonment), and his culpable conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts