Anand Pratap Jarwal vs State of Maharashtra — 38/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001692026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
38/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
334
Police Station
PACHOD
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anand Pratap Jarwal
Adv. Shinde S.S.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 12-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
| 07-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Bail Application No. 38/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Anand Pratap Jarwal's bail application under Section 483 BNSS for NDPS Act violations involving commercial quantity ganja. The court found that the applicant failed to establish prima facie innocence or that he would not reoffend if released, as required under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for commercial quantity offences. Key Reasoning: The 67.5 kg ganja seized exceeds the 20 kg commercial quantity threshold. The court dismissed arguments that neutral substances should be excluded (citing Supreme Court precedent), that the substance wasn't ganja (chemical analysis confirmed it), and that bail should be granted on parity grounds with a co-accused (such claims must be made to the same court that granted the earlier bail). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Bail Application No. 38/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Anand Pratap Jarwal's bail application under Section 483 BNSS for NDPS Act violations involving commercial quantity ganja. The court found that the applicant failed to establish prima facie innocence or that he would not reoffend if released, as required under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for commercial quantity offences. Key Reasoning: The 67.5 kg ganja seized exceeds the 20 kg commercial quantity threshold. The court dismissed arguments that neutral substances should be excluded (citing Supreme Court precedent), that the substance wasn't ganja (chemical analysis confirmed it), and that bail should be granted on parity grounds with a co-accused (such claims must be made to the same court that granted the earlier bail). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts