Diesel Pandurang Kale vs State of Maharashtra — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHAU170001672026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

95/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

513

Police Station

BIDKIN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Diesel Pandurang Kale

Adv. Kakde G.S.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

04-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Diesel Pandurang Kale's second bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 79, 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), and 351(2). The court found that the charge-sheet filing did not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail. The judge held that the gravity of the offense (assault with an iron rod causing grievous injury to the head, indicating intent to kill) and risk of witness tampering outweighed bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Diesel Pandurang Kale's second bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 79, 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), and 351(2). The court found that the charge-sheet filing did not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail. The judge held that the gravity of the offense (assault with an iron rod causing grievous injury to the head, indicating intent to kill) and risk of witness tampering outweighed bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case