Diesel Pandurang Kale vs State of Maharashtra — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001672026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
513
Police Station
BIDKIN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Diesel Pandurang Kale
Adv. Kakde G.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Diesel Pandurang Kale's second bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 79, 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), and 351(2). The court found that the charge-sheet filing did not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail. The judge held that the gravity of the offense (assault with an iron rod causing grievous injury to the head, indicating intent to kill) and risk of witness tampering outweighed bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
04-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Case Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Diesel Pandurang Kale's second bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 109, 79, 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), and 351(2). The court found that the charge-sheet filing did not constitute a change in circumstances warranting bail. The judge held that the gravity of the offense (assault with an iron rod causing grievous injury to the head, indicating intent to kill) and risk of witness tampering outweighed bail consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts