Mahendra Raghunath Wahule vs State of Maharashtra — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU170001632026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
PAITHAN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahendra Raghunath Wahule
Adv. Barje P.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 35/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Mahendra Raghunath Wahule's anticipatory bail application in a knife-point robbery case (s.309(4) BNS 2023). The court found the offense serious with eyewitness support, deemed custodial interrogation necessary for weapon and cash recovery, and cited the applicant's prior criminal record and risk of witness tampering as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2026
Summary of Case 35/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan rejected Mahendra Raghunath Wahule's anticipatory bail application in a knife-point robbery case (s.309(4) BNS 2023). The court found the offense serious with eyewitness support, deemed custodial interrogation necessary for weapon and cash recovery, and cited the applicant's prior criminal record and risk of witness tampering as grounds for denial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts