Sadhna Bhalchandra Rodi vs Meena Durgadas Gonge Advocate - Jadhav S.L. — 13/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION on 24th April 2026.

R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal

CNR: MHAU170001362025

Case disposed

Filing Number

70/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2024

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

22-01-2024

Court

Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEMENT BY MEDIATION

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96
IA/1/2025 Classification : Stay to Execution of Decree Section Sadhna Bhalchandra RodiMeena Durgadas Gonge

Petitioner(s)

Sadhna Bhalchandra Rodi

Adv. Pallod Y.R.

Somnath Alias Shubham Bhalchandra Rodi

Adv. Pallod Y.R.

Shruti Bhalchandra Rodi

Adv. Pallod Y.R.

Rutika Bhalchandra Rodi

Adv. Pallod Y.R.

Respondent(s)

Meena Durgadas Gonge Advocate - Jadhav S.L.

Pushpa Prakash Kotambe

Sumanbai Shesharao Rodi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge

24-04-2026

Disposed

15-04-2026

Paper Book

24-03-2026

Paper Book

12-03-2026

Paper Book

06-02-2026

Paper Book

Final Orders / Judgements

24-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The District Judge dismissed Regular Civil Appeal No. 13/2025 by recording a compromise decree after the matter was referred to mediation. Both parties and their advocates appeared before the court, admitted the contents of the Compromise Memo (Exh.16), and confirmed the settlement reached between them, whereupon the court directed that a compromise decree be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The District Judge dismissed Regular Civil Appeal No. 13/2025 by recording a compromise decree after the matter was referred to mediation. Both parties and their advocates appeared before the court, admitted the contents of the Compromise Memo (Exh.16), and confirmed the settlement reached between them, whereupon the court directed that a compromise decree be drawn accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case