Shivay Enterprises vs Aditya Uttam Rathod — 2/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHAU170000302026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
Paithan, Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shivay Enterprises
Adv. Murkute J.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aditya Uttam Rathod
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Compliance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 2/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan suspended Shivay Enterprises' imprisonment sentence pending appeal and granted bail, subject to depositing Rs. 38,80,000 (20% of the awarded compensation of Rs. 1,94,00,000). The appellant was also required to execute a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the case qualified as an exception to the 20% deposit requirement under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding no merit in the claim that trial court error prejudiced the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jan-2026
Compliance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2026
Case 2/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Paithan suspended Shivay Enterprises' imprisonment sentence pending appeal and granted bail, subject to depositing Rs. 38,80,000 (20% of the awarded compensation of Rs. 1,94,00,000). The appellant was also required to execute a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 with surety. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the case qualified as an exception to the 20% deposit requirement under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding no merit in the claim that trial court error prejudiced the appellant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts