Shlok Santosh Pawar vs State of Maharashtra — 79/2025
Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 8(2). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 28th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU160041122025
e-Filing Number
18-07-2025
Filing Number
1989/2025
Filing Date
19-07-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
19-07-2025
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shlok Santosh Pawar
Adv. JOSHI SANJAY RADHAKRISHNARAO
Sunita Santosh Pawar
Adv. JOSHI SANJAY RADHAKRISHNARAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 79/2025 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petition filed by Shlok Santosh Pawar (minor, 8 years old, through mother Sunita) and Sunita Santosh Pawar seeking permission to sell agricultural property (0.20 acres) registered in the minor child's name. The court held that while the mother sought to use sale proceeds for the child's education and welfare, the sale arrangement lacked proper legal safeguards—specifically, the sale agreement was notarized rather than registered under the Registration Act, failing to meet statutory requirements. The court concluded that permitting the sale would not adequately protect the minor's interests and welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 79/2025 Court Decision: The court REJECTED the petition filed by Shlok Santosh Pawar (minor, 8 years old, through mother Sunita) and Sunita Santosh Pawar seeking permission to sell agricultural property (0.20 acres) registered in the minor child's name. The court held that while the mother sought to use sale proceeds for the child's education and welfare, the sale arrangement lacked proper legal safeguards—specifically, the sale agreement was notarized rather than registered under the Registration Act, failing to meet statutory requirements. The court concluded that permitting the sale would not adequately protect the minor's interests and welfare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts