Sunita Santosh Patekar Urf Sunita Bhagwan Pathade vs Nirmala Udhhav Nikam Advocate - Kasane S.S. — 71/2025

Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 7,8,9and12. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 22nd April 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU160039212025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-06-2025

Filing Number

1854/2025

Filing Date

18-06-2025

Registration No

71/2025

Registration Date

18-06-2025

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT Section 7,8,9and12

Petitioner(s)

Sunita Santosh Patekar Urf Sunita Bhagwan Pathade

Adv. AFTAB S. SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

Nirmala Udhhav Nikam Advocate - Kasane S.S.

Ankush Vasantrao Patekar

Adv. Kasane S.S.

Chandrabhagabai Vasantrao Patekar

Adv. Kasane S.S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

22-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Evidence

07-03-2026

Evidence

21-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Sunita Santosh Patekar v. Nirmala Udhhav Nikam & Others (71/2025) Court Decision: The court rejected the petition filed by Sunita (petitioner) seeking custody of her two minor children—daughter Kartiki (age 12) and son Rudra (age 8)—from the respondents. Key Reasoning: The court found that after Sunita remarried Bhagwan Pathade on 07.02.2025, she moved to Doregaon with her new husband, leaving the children in the care of relatives at Limbejalgaon. The court noted: (1) Sunita lacks independent income and is dependent on her second husband; (2) the son Rudra is intellectually disabled and is appropriately placed in a special school with full financial support from respondents; (3) the daughter Kartiki, now 14, expressed her preference to remain with the grandmother (respondent #3) and continue schooling at Limbejalgaon; (4) the respondents—an extended joint family—have provided proper care and education; and (5) Sunita demonstrated insufficient concern for the children's education by not prioritizing their schooling after remarriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sunita Santosh Patekar v. Nirmala Udhhav Nikam & Others (71/2025) Court Decision: The court rejected the petition filed by Sunita (petitioner) seeking custody of her two minor children—daughter Kartiki (age 12) and son Rudra (age 8)—from the respondents. Key Reasoning: The court found that after Sunita remarried Bhagwan Pathade on 07.02.2025, she moved to Doregaon with her new husband, leaving the children in the care of relatives at Limbejalgaon. The court noted: (1) Sunita lacks independent income and is dependent on her second husband; (2) the son Rudra is intellectually disabled and is appropriately placed in a special school with full financial support from respondents; (3) the daughter Kartiki, now 14, expressed her preference to remain with the grandmother (respondent #3) and continue schooling at Limbejalgaon; (4) the respondents—an extended joint family—have provided proper care and education; and (5) Sunita demonstrated insufficient concern for the children's education by not prioritizing their schooling after remarriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case