State of Maharashtra vs Nitin Jaychandra Sawaji Advocate - Chavan A.G. — 1066/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,506,34. Status: Hearing Before Charge. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHAU160038122025
Filing Number
2058/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
1066/2025
Registration Date
04-Jun-2025
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
307
Police Station
MIDC WALUJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. Gande K.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitin Jaychandra Sawaji Advocate - Chavan A.G.
-
2.Laxmikant Jaychand Sawaji
Adv. Rajebhosale S.B.
-
3.Pravin Jaychandra Sawaji
Adv. Chavan A.G.
-
4.Raji alias Ravindra Ramdas
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
CASE SUMMARY Case: State of Maharashtra v. Nitin Jaychand Savaji, Special Case No. 1066/2025 Outcome: Anticipatory bail application REJECTED Nitin Jaychand Savaji sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving allegations of sexual assault, caste-based abuse, and atrocities against a Schedule Caste woman. The court rejected his application on 02.04.2026, holding that Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act imposes a statutory bar on granting anticipatory bail when allegations attract atrocities act provisions, including caste-based insult and humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing Before Charge
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
25-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
09-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
05-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
25-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
21-Feb-2026
Appearance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
30-Jan-2026
Appearance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
18-Dec-2025
Appearance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
03-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Appearance
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
30-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
29-Oct-2025
Order on Exh
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
08-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
26-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
22-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
19-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
12-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1066/2025
CASE SUMMARY Case: State of Maharashtra v. Nitin Jaychand Savaji, Special Case No. 1066/2025 Outcome: Anticipatory bail application REJECTED Nitin Jaychand Savaji sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving allegations of sexual assault, caste-based abuse, and atrocities against a Schedule Caste woman. The court rejected his application on 02.04.2026, holding that Section 18 of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act imposes a statutory bar on granting anticipatory bail when allegations attract atrocities act provisions, including caste-based insult and humiliation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts