State of Maharashtra vs Ganesh Namdeo Bhalerao Advocate - Sawant S.B. — 684/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHAU160032242025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1535/2025

Filing Date

14-09-2018

Registration No

684/2025

Registration Date

14-09-2018

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

WALUJ

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 354,34
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. Ankush A.U.

Respondent(s)

Ganesh Namdeo Bhalerao Advocate - Sawant S.B.

Manoj Santosh Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

18-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgment

12-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

06-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary In this case, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur acquitted both accused—Ganesh Namdev Bhalerao and Manoj Santosh Patil—charged under IPC Section 354 (read with 34) and POCSO Act Sections 8 and 12 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a girl on 14.01.2017. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the victim was a "child" as defined under POCSO (below 18 years), relying only on school records without producing the original birth certificate or medical evidence; additionally, the victim herself retracted her evidence during cross-examination, admitting she had good relations with the accused and lodged the FIR due to her mother's misunderstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In this case, the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur acquitted both accused—Ganesh Namdev Bhalerao and Manoj Santosh Patil—charged under IPC Section 354 (read with 34) and POCSO Act Sections 8 and 12 for allegedly outraging the modesty of a girl on 14.01.2017. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the victim was a "child" as defined under POCSO (below 18 years), relying only on school records without producing the original birth certificate or medical evidence; additionally, the victim herself retracted her evidence during cross-examination, admitting she had good relations with the accused and lodged the FIR due to her mother's misunderstanding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case