State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj vs Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad Advocate - Sawant S.B. — 118/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,108. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAU160005832025
Filing Number
265/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2024
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2024
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
868
Police Station
MIDC WALUJ
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj
Adv. Gande K.S.
Respondent(s)
Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad Advocate - Sawant S.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 17-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.No.118 of 2025 Accused Acquitted in Dowry Death and Abetment Case The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad of charges under Sections 80 (dowry death) and 108 (abetment of suicide) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted his wife Nishi Kumariya's suicide through dowry-related cruelty. The court found the evidence of alleged unlawful demands vague and unreliable, noting the prosecution did not collect phone records (CDR/SDR) to corroborate claimed communications between deceased and her father, and did not establish that demands constituted "dowry" as legally defined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.No.118 of 2025 Accused Acquitted in Dowry Death and Abetment Case The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad of charges under Sections 80 (dowry death) and 108 (abetment of suicide) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted his wife Nishi Kumariya's suicide through dowry-related cruelty. The court found the evidence of alleged unlawful demands vague and unreliable, noting the prosecution did not collect phone records (CDR/SDR) to corroborate claimed communications between deceased and her father, and did not establish that demands constituted "dowry" as legally defined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts