State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj vs Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad Advocate - Sawant S.B. — 118/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,108. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHAU160005832025

Case disposed

Filing Number

265/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2024

Registration No

118/2025

Registration Date

17-12-2024

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

868

Police Station

MIDC WALUJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,108

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj

Adv. Gande K.S.

Respondent(s)

Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad Advocate - Sawant S.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgment

05-03-2026

Arguments

25-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

17-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: S.C.No.118 of 2025 Accused Acquitted in Dowry Death and Abetment Case The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad of charges under Sections 80 (dowry death) and 108 (abetment of suicide) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted his wife Nishi Kumariya's suicide through dowry-related cruelty. The court found the evidence of alleged unlawful demands vague and unreliable, noting the prosecution did not collect phone records (CDR/SDR) to corroborate claimed communications between deceased and her father, and did not establish that demands constituted "dowry" as legally defined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.No.118 of 2025 Accused Acquitted in Dowry Death and Abetment Case The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted Gaurishankar Mahesh Prasad of charges under Sections 80 (dowry death) and 108 (abetment of suicide) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution failed to prove that the accused abetted his wife Nishi Kumariya's suicide through dowry-related cruelty. The court found the evidence of alleged unlawful demands vague and unreliable, noting the prosecution did not collect phone records (CDR/SDR) to corroborate claimed communications between deceased and her father, and did not establish that demands constituted "dowry" as legally defined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case