Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe vs State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur — 40/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU160004782026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
86/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
40/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
454
Police Station
GANGAPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe
Adv. MALPANI ANKIT RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe in a contractual dispute with Jay Hind Sugar Factory. Mundhe, a labour contractor, received ₹10 lakh from the factory for supplying workers but allegedly failed to provide labour as agreed. The court found this a civil breach of contract matter rather than criminal fraud, noting Mundhe disputed the charges and the factory added "hidden penalty charges." Relying on Supreme Court precedent distinguishing civil disputes from criminal offences, the court held that prosecuting a contractual disagreement under criminal sections was an abuse of process. Bail was conditioned on a ₹50,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe v. State of Maharashtra (40/2026) The court granted anticipatory bail to applicant Prabhakar Ranjeet Mundhe in a contractual dispute with Jay Hind Sugar Factory. Mundhe, a labour contractor, received ₹10 lakh from the factory for supplying workers but allegedly failed to provide labour as agreed. The court found this a civil breach of contract matter rather than criminal fraud, noting Mundhe disputed the charges and the factory added "hidden penalty charges." Relying on Supreme Court precedent distinguishing civil disputes from criminal offences, the court held that prosecuting a contractual disagreement under criminal sections was an abuse of process. Bail was conditioned on a ₹50,000 bond, weekly police station reporting, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts