Pravin Anil Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra ps MIDC Waluj — 39/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU160004732026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
85/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
119
Police Station
MIDC WALUJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pravin Anil Jadhav
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
2.Sonu Anil Jadhav
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
3.Anill S o Pertras Jadhav
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
4.Sachin so Anil jadhav
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
5.Pooja w o Sachin Jadhav
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
6.Shubhangi wo Sachin kolge
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
-
7.Seema wo Ravi salve
Adv. WAKALE VIJAY SHIVAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra ps (Police Station) MIDC Waluj
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to seven applicants accused of dowry harassment and cruelty in a matrimonial dispute case. The judge found that over five years had passed since the last alleged incident (December 2020) before the FIR was filed (February 2026), creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' genuineness. Each applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police station reporting for 60 days and no tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to seven applicants accused of dowry harassment and cruelty in a matrimonial dispute case. The judge found that over five years had passed since the last alleged incident (December 2020) before the FIR was filed (February 2026), creating reasonable doubt about the allegations' genuineness. Each applicant was released on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including weekly police station reporting for 60 days and no tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts