Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare vs State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj — 37/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU160004672026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
83/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
152
Police Station
MIDC WALUJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare
Adv. JOSHI NANDKUMAR SADASHIV
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 37/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare, accused of assaulting Shahid Abdul Majid with a knife during a communal altercation in Hanuman Nagar on March 3, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of serious offences under attempted murder provisions, noting the applicant inflicted multiple grievous injuries and the victim remained hospitalized. Despite the applicant having no criminal history and being a permanent resident, the court deemed the nature of the offence serious and feared risks of absconding and evidence tampering during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 37/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare, accused of assaulting Shahid Abdul Majid with a knife during a communal altercation in Hanuman Nagar on March 3, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of serious offences under attempted murder provisions, noting the applicant inflicted multiple grievous injuries and the victim remained hospitalized. Despite the applicant having no criminal history and being a permanent resident, the court deemed the nature of the offence serious and feared risks of absconding and evidence tampering during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts