Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare vs State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHAU160004672026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

07-03-2026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

152

Police Station

MIDC WALUJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare

Adv. JOSHI NANDKUMAR SADASHIV

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

20-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Order

16-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 37/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare, accused of assaulting Shahid Abdul Majid with a knife during a communal altercation in Hanuman Nagar on March 3, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of serious offences under attempted murder provisions, noting the applicant inflicted multiple grievous injuries and the victim remained hospitalized. Despite the applicant having no criminal history and being a permanent resident, the court deemed the nature of the offence serious and feared risks of absconding and evidence tampering during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 37/2026 The court rejected the bail application of Dnyaneshwar Ratan Lohkare, accused of assaulting Shahid Abdul Majid with a knife during a communal altercation in Hanuman Nagar on March 3, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of serious offences under attempted murder provisions, noting the applicant inflicted multiple grievous injuries and the victim remained hospitalized. Despite the applicant having no criminal history and being a permanent resident, the court deemed the nature of the offence serious and feared risks of absconding and evidence tampering during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case