Ashish Dnyaneshwar Mavas vs State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU160004652026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
82/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
GANGAPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashish Dnyaneshwar Mavas
Adv. SAPKAL GAJANAN DAMODHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to Ashish Dnyaneshwar Mavas in connection with a group assault case where he allegedly beat the victim with fist and kick blows. The judge found that the victim survived and was discharged from hospital, the applicant had no criminal history, investigation was nearly complete, and his permanent residence in the area allowed securing his presence through bail conditions rather than continued detention. Bail was set at Rs. 30,000 with conditions including weekly police station reporting for 60 days and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2026
The court granted bail to Ashish Dnyaneshwar Mavas in connection with a group assault case where he allegedly beat the victim with fist and kick blows. The judge found that the victim survived and was discharged from hospital, the applicant had no criminal history, investigation was nearly complete, and his permanent residence in the area allowed securing his presence through bail conditions rather than continued detention. Bail was set at Rs. 30,000 with conditions including weekly police station reporting for 60 days and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts