Kabai Alias Kapbai Dagadu Bhosale vs State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur — 35/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHAU160004562026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

35/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

GANGAPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kabai Alias Kapbai Dagadu Bhosale

    Adv. CHAVAN GORAKHANATH BABURAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra P.S. Gangapur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 35/2026 Summary The court rejected Kabai Alias Kapbai Dagadu Bhosale's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving Rs. 55,000 cash and a gold nose ring stolen from a house in Manjari village. The court found sufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, noting that the SIM card in the arrested co-accused Darya Bhosale's mobile phone was registered in the applicant's name, Darya had named her as an accomplice during interrogation, and the stolen gold nose ring remained unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 35/2026 Summary The court rejected Kabai Alias Kapbai Dagadu Bhosale's anticipatory bail application in a theft case involving Rs. 55,000 cash and a gold nose ring stolen from a house in Manjari village. The court found sufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, noting that the SIM card in the arrested co-accused Darya Bhosale's mobile phone was registered in the applicant's name, Darya had named her as an accomplice during interrogation, and the stolen gold nose ring remained unrecovered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case