State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj vs Anita @ Parigabai Prabhakar Tribhuvan — 82/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: MHAU160003312025

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

172/2025

Filing Date

26-08-2024

Registration No

82/2025

Registration Date

26-08-2024

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

467

Police Station

MIDC WALUJ

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,201,34
IA/2/2025 Classification : Bail Application Section State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC WalujAnita @ Parigabai Prabhakar Tribhuvan

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra P.S. MIDC Waluj

Adv. Gande K.S.

Respondent(s)

Anita @ Parigabai Prabhakar Tribhuvan

Dilip Prabhakar Tribhuvan

Adv. Ghoderao A.V.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

22-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

25-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

14-10-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: S.C. No. 82/2025 Outcome: Second bail application REJECTED Anita @ Parigabai Prabhakar Tribhuvan and Dilip Prabhakar Tribhuvan filed a second bail application arguing that one year had elapsed since their first bail rejection without trial commencement, violating their Article 21 rights. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding sufficient evidence of guilt (they allegedly assaulted the deceased with a wooden plank and stone causing fatal head injuries), determining that delay in trial alone does not mandate bail when evidence is strong and risk of absconding/evidence tampering exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C. No. 82/2025 Outcome: Second bail application REJECTED Anita @ Parigabai Prabhakar Tribhuvan and Dilip Prabhakar Tribhuvan filed a second bail application arguing that one year had elapsed since their first bail rejection without trial commencement, violating their Article 21 rights. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application, finding sufficient evidence of guilt (they allegedly assaulted the deceased with a wooden plank and stone causing fatal head injuries), determining that delay in trial alone does not mandate bail when evidence is strong and risk of absconding/evidence tampering exists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case