Ramesh Uttamrao Warape vs Rambhau Sampatrao Sonawane Advocate - Dheple R.A. — 113/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU130001902016

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

13th June 2026

Filing Number

215/2016

Filing Date

16-11-2016

Registration No

113/2016

Registration Date

17-11-2016

Court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39
IA/2/2018 Classification : Objection as to Jurisdiction Maintainability Section Ramesh Uttamrao WarapeMunicipal Corporation, Aurangabad Through The Commissioner

Petitioner(s)

Ramesh Uttamrao Warape

Adv. Quraishi A.M.

Respondent(s)

Rambhau Sampatrao Sonawane Advocate - Dheple R.A.

Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Through The Commissioner

Adv. Kadam V.D.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

22-04-2026

Defence Evidence

12-03-2026

Defence Evidence

04-03-2026

Order on Exh

11-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

03-02-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 113/2016 Defendant No.1 Ramesh Uttamrao Warape's application to set aside the order closing his evidence was allowed. The court set aside the 19.01.2026 order that had closed the defendant's evidence due to miscommunication between him and his advocate. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff to compensate for inconvenience caused by the defendant's previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 113/2016 Defendant No.1 Ramesh Uttamrao Warape's application to set aside the order closing his evidence was allowed. The court set aside the 19.01.2026 order that had closed the defendant's evidence due to miscommunication between him and his advocate. However, the defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the plaintiff to compensate for inconvenience caused by the defendant's previous adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case