Samina Bagum vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Padwale D.E. — 60/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130001572018
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
109/2018
Filing Date
03-09-2018
Registration No
60/2018
Registration Date
04-09-2018
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Samina Bagum
Adv. Songire V.R.
Murad Khan Bismillah Khan Pathan
Respondent(s)
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Padwale D.E.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Evidence Part Heard
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 13-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 31-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 07-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 60/2018 - Samina Bagum vs. Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to issue summons to witnesses in their dispute with the Municipal Corporation over alleged unauthorized construction on their property. The court found the proposed witnesses—a corporation officer and persons who witnessed the construction before 1982—necessary to determine whether the corporation unlawfully obstructed the plaintiffs' peaceful possession. Summons were ordered issued upon payment of Bhatta by the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 60/2018 - Samina Bagum vs. Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to issue summons to witnesses in their dispute with the Municipal Corporation over alleged unauthorized construction on their property. The court found the proposed witnesses—a corporation officer and persons who witnessed the construction before 1982—necessary to determine whether the corporation unlawfully obstructed the plaintiffs' peaceful possession. Summons were ordered issued upon payment of Bhatta by the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts