Mukhtar Begum vs Abrar Ahmed Advocate - Padwale D.E. — 1400023/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39Rule1,2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHAU130001442015
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
1400149/2015
Filing Date
14-09-2015
Registration No
1400023/2015
Registration Date
16-09-2015
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mukhtar Begum
Adv. Sonpethkar P.N.
Respondent(s)
Abrar Ahmed Advocate - Padwale D.E.
Iftekhar Ahmed Mohammad Isaq
Adv. Koranne Sachin S.
Vikar Ahmed Mohammad Isaq
Adv. Koranne Sachin S.
Sardar Begum Late Hamid Moizoddin
Adv. Kshirsagar S.M.
Unaiza Begum Shujat Ali khan
Adv. Kshirsagar S.M.
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Through Its Commissioner
Adv. Pathak A.S.
The Special Land Acquisition Special Unit Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
1-A Nikath Shabana /Abrar Ahmed Siddiqui
Adv. Padwale D.E.
1-B Afrat Ahmed Siddiqui Abrar Ahmed Siddiqui
Adv. Padwale D.E.
1-C Sara Fatima Abrar Ahmed Siddiqui
1-D Sanobar Fatuna Abrar Ahmed Siddiqui
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Issues |
| 28-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 24-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mukhtar Begum v. Abrar Ahmed Advocate (Spl.C.S. No.23/2015) The court allowed plaintiff Mukhtar Begum's application to amend the plaint. During the suit's pendency, defendant No.1 had expired, and his legal heirs were substituted as parties (defendants 1-A to 1-D); however, suit summons to them remained unserved. The court permitted the amendment to enable the plaintiff to update the defendants' new addresses on record, finding the amendment necessary for fair disposal of the suit and arising from a subsequent event. The plaintiff was directed to incorporate the amendment on the next date positively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mukhtar Begum v. Abrar Ahmed Advocate (Spl.C.S. No.23/2015) The court allowed plaintiff Mukhtar Begum's application to amend the plaint. During the suit's pendency, defendant No.1 had expired, and his legal heirs were substituted as parties (defendants 1-A to 1-D); however, suit summons to them remained unserved. The court permitted the amendment to enable the plaintiff to update the defendants' new addresses on record, finding the amendment necessary for fair disposal of the suit and arising from a subsequent event. The plaintiff was directed to incorporate the amendment on the next date positively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts