Mohammad Zakiyoddin s/o Sirajoddin Siddiqui vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Wasadikar J.K. — 76/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU130001022025

Issues

Next Hearing

30th June 2026

e-Filing Number

19-12-2025

Filing Number

99/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

76/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

Mohammad Zakiyoddin s/o Sirajoddin Siddiqui

Adv. Khan I.S.

Respondent(s)

Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Wasadikar J.K.

The City Engineer

Adv. Wasadikar J.K.

The Deputy Director

Adv. Wasadikar J.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

17-04-2026

Issues

13-03-2026

Issues

12-03-2026

Order on Exh

05-03-2026

Order on Exh

26-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: RCS 76/2025 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected. The court found that Mohammad Zakiyoddin failed to establish a prima facie case against Municipal Corporation Aurangabad's road widening and drain-laying work on his property. The court held that a drainage channel (Nala) existed on the property per official records, the Corporation had statutory duties to maintain municipal drains, and the plaintiff could receive monetary compensation if property was acquired improperly—thus no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction. The balance of convenience favored the defendant Corporation's ability to exercise its statutory powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 76/2025 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected. The court found that Mohammad Zakiyoddin failed to establish a prima facie case against Municipal Corporation Aurangabad's road widening and drain-laying work on his property. The court held that a drainage channel (Nala) existed on the property per official records, the Corporation had statutory duties to maintain municipal drains, and the plaintiff could receive monetary compensation if property was acquired improperly—thus no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction. The balance of convenience favored the defendant Corporation's ability to exercise its statutory powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case