Mohammad Zakiyoddin s/o Sirajoddin Siddiqui vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Wasadikar J.K. — 76/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130001022025
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
99/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
76/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammad Zakiyoddin s/o Sirajoddin Siddiqui
Adv. Khan I.S.
Respondent(s)
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Wasadikar J.K.
The City Engineer
Adv. Wasadikar J.K.
The Deputy Director
Adv. Wasadikar J.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Issues
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Issues |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 05-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 26-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 76/2025 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected. The court found that Mohammad Zakiyoddin failed to establish a prima facie case against Municipal Corporation Aurangabad's road widening and drain-laying work on his property. The court held that a drainage channel (Nala) existed on the property per official records, the Corporation had statutory duties to maintain municipal drains, and the plaintiff could receive monetary compensation if property was acquired improperly—thus no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction. The balance of convenience favored the defendant Corporation's ability to exercise its statutory powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 76/2025 Outcome: The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction was rejected. The court found that Mohammad Zakiyoddin failed to establish a prima facie case against Municipal Corporation Aurangabad's road widening and drain-laying work on his property. The court held that a drainage channel (Nala) existed on the property per official records, the Corporation had statutory duties to maintain municipal drains, and the plaintiff could receive monetary compensation if property was acquired improperly—thus no irreparable loss would result from refusing the injunction. The balance of convenience favored the defendant Corporation's ability to exercise its statutory powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts