Gajarabi Shaikh Osman Shaikh CHand vs Muktanand Granirman Sanstha Advocate - Shah K.S. — 51/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130000902021
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
127/2021
Filing Date
10-11-2021
Registration No
51/2021
Registration Date
11-11-2021
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajarabi Shaikh Osman Shaikh CHand
Adv. Nehri S.R.
Shaikh Kadar Shaikh Osman
Shaikh Hasham Shaikh Osman
Shaikh Ishaq Shaikh Osman
Shaikh Sharifabi Shaikh Shamir
Respondent(s)
Muktanand Granirman Sanstha Advocate - Shah K.S.
Bhagwan Laxman Pawar
a. Rajiv Vithalrao Bankar
b) Alim Khan Jalaluddin Khan
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
Adv. Wasadikar J.K.
2-i Muktabai Bhagwan Pawar
Adv. Mohammed A.S.
Ganesh Bhagwan Pawar
Ramesh Bhagwan Pawar
Umesh Bhagwan Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
The court allowed Muktanand Granirman Sanstha's application to set aside the March 1, 2023 order proceeding without a written statement, finding that while the defendant was negligent in filing late (two years after the order), deciding the case on merit outweighed this delay. The court imposed Rs. 2,000 costs on the defendant as compensation to the plaintiffs for the inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Muktanand Granirman Sanstha's application to set aside the March 1, 2023 order proceeding without a written statement, finding that while the defendant was negligent in filing late (two years after the order), deciding the case on merit outweighed this delay. The court imposed Rs. 2,000 costs on the defendant as compensation to the plaintiffs for the inconvenience caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts