Sandu Ganpat Kayastha vs The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad. Advocate - Pathak A.S. — 41/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130000722016
Filing Number
95/2016
Filing Date
26-04-2016
Registration No
41/2016
Registration Date
27-04-2016
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandu Ganpat Kayastha
Adv. Dantal K.B.
Mahesh Sandu Kayastha
Suresh Sandu Kayastha
Bharati Sandu Kayastha
Respondent(s)
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad. Advocate - Pathak A.S.
The Administrative Officer, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS No. 41/2016 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for perpetual injunction against the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. The plaintiffs, who claimed ownership of property acquired via a 1995 rent agreement (Bhade Patta), sought to restrain the corporation from constructing a road and acquiring 61.80 sq. meters of their property. The court found the plaintiffs were not legitimate owners (the actual owner being Dargah Shaha Daud Saheb), that the corporation lawfully obtained possession per a signed receipt, and that the suit was unmaintainable for lack of mandatory notice under Section 487 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act. The court held plaintiffs' remedy lay in pursuing compensation claims through land acquisition proceedings, not injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 41/2016 The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for perpetual injunction against the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. The plaintiffs, who claimed ownership of property acquired via a 1995 rent agreement (Bhade Patta), sought to restrain the corporation from constructing a road and acquiring 61.80 sq. meters of their property. The court found the plaintiffs were not legitimate owners (the actual owner being Dargah Shaha Daud Saheb), that the corporation lawfully obtained possession per a signed receipt, and that the suit was unmaintainable for lack of mandatory notice under Section 487 of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act. The court held plaintiffs' remedy lay in pursuing compensation claims through land acquisition proceedings, not injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts