Sultana Begum Sk Ismail vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Shelar R.J. — 38/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER39RULE1AND2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU130000532025

e-Filing Number

07-05-2025

Filing Number

53/2025

Filing Date

07-May-2025

Registration No

38/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER39RULE1AND2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sultana Begum Sk Ismail

    Adv. Rahatali Jahagirdar

  2. 2.Sk Khalil Sk Mohammed

    Adv. Rahatali Jahagirdar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Shelar R.J.

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 38/2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad from demolishing their property. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, as they could not produce documents proving the construction was authorized. The court determined the balance of convenience favored the defendant corporation, which had followed due procedure under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 before issuing a demolition notice on 17.04.2025 for alleged road encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  11. 01-Dec-2025

    Reply/Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  14. 18-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  17. 24-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  18. 10-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  19. 20-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  20. 06-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  21. 29-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  22. 16-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  23. 26-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  24. 12-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge S.d., Corporation Court, Aurangabad

  25. 07-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 07-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 07-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 38/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 38/2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad from demolishing their property. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, as they could not produce documents proving the construction was authorized. The court determined the balance of convenience favored the defendant corporation, which had followed due procedure under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 before issuing a demolition notice on 17.04.2025 for alleged road encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case