Sultana Begum Sk Ismail vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Shelar R.J. — 38/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER39RULE1AND2. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130000532025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
53/2025
Filing Date
07-05-2025
Registration No
38/2025
Registration Date
07-05-2025
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sultana Begum Sk Ismail
Adv. Rahatali Jahagirdar
Sk Khalil Sk Mohammed
Adv. Rahatali Jahagirdar
Respondent(s)
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Shelar R.J.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Issues
Issues
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Issues |
| 09-02-2026 | Issues |
| 05-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 38/2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad from demolishing their property. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, as they could not produce documents proving the construction was authorized. The court determined the balance of convenience favored the defendant corporation, which had followed due procedure under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 before issuing a demolition notice on 17.04.2025 for alleged road encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 38/2025 The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad from demolishing their property. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, as they could not produce documents proving the construction was authorized. The court determined the balance of convenience favored the defendant corporation, which had followed due procedure under the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 before issuing a demolition notice on 17.04.2025 for alleged road encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts