Ganesh Sainath Kaveti vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Pathak A.S. — 24/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130000402022
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
48/2022
Filing Date
20-05-2022
Registration No
24/2022
Registration Date
21-05-2022
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Sainath Kaveti
Adv. Bhosale A.B.
Rupesh Sainath Kaveti
Adv. Bhosale A.B.
Kantabai Sainath Kaveti
Adv. Bhosale A.B.
Respondent(s)
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Pathak A.S.
Inventory Officer,
Adv. Pathak A.S.
Town Building Officer,
Adv. Pathak A.S.
Mangamma Hiralal Chaplollu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Amended W.S.
Amended W.S.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 31-01-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Amended W.S. |
| 04-11-2025 | Amended W.S. |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ganesh Sainath Kaveti v. Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad (RCS/24/2022) The application to substitute the legal representatives of deceased defendant No.4 was allowed. The court granted permission to substitute the deceased defendant's legal representatives on record, accepting the plaintiff's sworn statement that defendant No.4 died on 30.09.2024 without requiring a death certificate, as the suit concerns perpetual injunction over immovable property where rights survive against legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ganesh Sainath Kaveti v. Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad (RCS/24/2022) The application to substitute the legal representatives of deceased defendant No.4 was allowed. The court granted permission to substitute the deceased defendant's legal representatives on record, accepting the plaintiff's sworn statement that defendant No.4 died on 30.09.2024 without requiring a death certificate, as the suit concerns perpetual injunction over immovable property where rights survive against legal representatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts