Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra — 13/2026

Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 16. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Elec.Petn. - Election Petition

CNR: MHAU130000142026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

14/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

Acts & Sections

Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 16

Petitioner(s)

Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed

Adv. Shaikh P.H.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

State Election Commissioner,

Election officer, Administrator

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD

20-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-03-2026

Order on Exh

04-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

20-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs. State of Maharashtra (Election Petition 13/2026) The petitioner's application to add 115 elected municipal councilors as party respondents was rejected. The court held they were not necessary parties since the petitioner failed to plead how the renaming of the corporation from "Aurangabad" to "Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar" materially affected the election results. The petition was scheduled for hearing on whether the pleadings should be struck out and the petition dismissed for failing to disclose a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs. State of Maharashtra (Election Petition 13/2026) The petitioner's application to add 115 elected municipal councilors as party respondents was rejected. The court held they were not necessary parties since the petitioner failed to plead how the renaming of the corporation from "Aurangabad" to "Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar" materially affected the election results. The petition was scheduled for hearing on whether the pleadings should be struck out and the petition dismissed for failing to disclose a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Corporation Court, Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case