Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs State of Maharashtra — 13/2026
Case under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Section 16. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Elec.Petn. - Election Petition
CNR: MHAU130000142026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
14/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed
Adv. Shaikh P.H.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
State Election Commissioner,
Election officer, Administrator
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs. State of Maharashtra (Election Petition 13/2026) The petitioner's application to add 115 elected municipal councilors as party respondents was rejected. The court held they were not necessary parties since the petitioner failed to plead how the renaming of the corporation from "Aurangabad" to "Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar" materially affected the election results. The petition was scheduled for hearing on whether the pleadings should be struck out and the petition dismissed for failing to disclose a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ahmed Jalees S/o Ashfaq Ahmed vs. State of Maharashtra (Election Petition 13/2026) The petitioner's application to add 115 elected municipal councilors as party respondents was rejected. The court held they were not necessary parties since the petitioner failed to plead how the renaming of the corporation from "Aurangabad" to "Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar" materially affected the election results. The petition was scheduled for hearing on whether the pleadings should be struck out and the petition dismissed for failing to disclose a valid cause of action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts