Arun Sadashiv Pagare vs Radhakrushna Ramdas Gayakwad Advocate - Suryawanshi S.P. — 133/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU120010512025

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

478/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

133/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arun Sadashiv Pagare

    Adv. Mahajan R.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhakrushna Ramdas Gayakwad Advocate - Suryawanshi S.P.

  2. 2.Yogesh Milind Pagare

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  4. 05-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In RCS No. 133/2025, the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) at Soygaon ordered summons to be issued to the defendants (Radhakrushna Ramdas Gayakwad Advocate, Suryawanshi S.P., and Yogesh Milind Pagare) to appear and file a written statement of defense within 30 days from service. The court also directed settlement of issues and production of all relevant documents in their possession per CPC Order 8, Rules 1 & 1(A). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 133/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In RCS No. 133/2025, the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) at Soygaon ordered summons to be issued to the defendants (Radhakrushna Ramdas Gayakwad Advocate, Suryawanshi S.P., and Yogesh Milind Pagare) to appear and file a written statement of defense within 30 days from service. The court also directed settlement of issues and production of all relevant documents in their possession per CPC Order 8, Rules 1 & 1(A). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case