Pandit Mahadu Raut vs Nill — 295/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU120009172025

e-Filing Number

01-11-2025

Filing Number

434/2025

Filing Date

03-Nov-2025

Registration No

295/2025

Registration Date

03-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pandit Mahadu Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  2. 2.Keshav Madhav alise Mahadu Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  3. 3.Pundalik Madhavrao Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  4. 4.Dnyaneshwar Madhav Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  5. 5.Kalabai Dashrath Sapkal

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  6. 6.Tapabai Eknath Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

  7. 7.Ananda Eknath Raut

    Adv. Adv TATHE RAVINDRA TRAMBAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nill

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 295/2025 The court granted the petition filed by seven heirs (Pandit Mahadu Raut, Keshav Madhav alias Mahadu Raut, Pundalik Madhavrao Raut, and four others) seeking a declaration as legal heirs of the deceased Guntabai Mahadu Raut (died 12.10.2018). After examining evidence, affidavits, and death certificates, the court recognized all seven petitioners as legitimate heirs under the Mumbai Regulation 1827 and issued a succession certificate, provided they pay the prescribed court fees. The certificate clarifies that it does not confer any proprietary rights over the deceased's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  13. 15-Jan-2026

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  15. 05-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 05-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 03-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 295/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 295/2025 The court granted the petition filed by seven heirs (Pandit Mahadu Raut, Keshav Madhav alias Mahadu Raut, Pundalik Madhavrao Raut, and four others) seeking a declaration as legal heirs of the deceased Guntabai Mahadu Raut (died 12.10.2018). After examining evidence, affidavits, and death certificates, the court recognized all seven petitioners as legitimate heirs under the Mumbai Regulation 1827 and issued a succession certificate, provided they pay the prescribed court fees. The certificate clarifies that it does not confer any proprietary rights over the deceased's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case