Nago Shenfadu Ladke vs Krushna Laxman Ladke — 93/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU120004682022

Filing Number

135/2022

Filing Date

14-Jul-2022

Registration No

93/2022

Registration Date

14-Jul-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Partition Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nago Shenfadu Ladke

    Adv. Giri R.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krushna Laxman Ladke

  2. 2.Yogesh Laxman Ladke

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  6. 05-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  10. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  11. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod

  12. 24-Feb-2025

    Hearing

  13. 06-Feb-2025

    Hearing

  14. 21-Dec-2024

    Hearing

  15. 28-Nov-2024

    Hearing

  16. 16-Nov-2024

    Compliance

  17. 25-Sep-2024

    Compliance

  18. 08-Aug-2024

    Compliance

  19. 20-Jun-2024

    Compliance

  20. 26-Apr-2024

    Compliance

  21. 07-Mar-2024

    Compliance

  22. 18-Jan-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 93/2022 Summary Petition Partly Allowed with Cost Award Petitioner Nago Shenfadu Ladke challenged an order dated 13.06.2023 dismissing the written reply of respondents Krushna Laxman Ladke and Yogesh Laxman Ladke due to delayed filing. The court found the delay unjustified but determined that the written reply should be placed on record as the case's merits should be decided on substantive grounds. The petition was allowed; the dismissal order was set aside; and respondents were ordered to pay ₹200 cost to the petitioner for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  23. 18-Jan-2024

    Compliance

  24. 04-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

  25. 27-Oct-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

  26. 01-Sep-2023

    Hearing

  27. 24-Jul-2023

    Hearing

  28. 13-Jun-2023

    Hearing

  29. 27-Apr-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  30. 06-Apr-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  31. 06-Mar-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  32. 14-Feb-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  33. 24-Jan-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  34. 17-Dec-2022

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  35. 07-Nov-2022

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  36. 28-Sep-2022

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  37. 16-Aug-2022

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  38. 14-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 14-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 93/2022 Summary Petition Partly Allowed with Cost Award Petitioner Nago Shenfadu Ladke challenged an order dated 13.06.2023 dismissing the written reply of respondents Krushna Laxman Ladke and Yogesh Laxman Ladke due to delayed filing. The court found the delay unjustified but determined that the written reply should be placed on record as the case's merits should be decided on substantive grounds. The petition was allowed; the dismissal order was set aside; and respondents were ordered to pay ₹200 cost to the petitioner for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case