Sumanbai Bhika Sapkal vs Pirkha Sharif Tadvi Advocate - Mahajan R.S. — 42/2020

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU120004312020

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

85/2020

Filing Date

12-08-2020

Registration No

42/2020

Registration Date

12-08-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

Sumanbai Bhika Sapkal

Adv. Giri R.A.

Vikas Baburao Borade

Adv. Giri R.A.

Respondent(s)

Pirkha Sharif Tadvi Advocate - Mahajan R.S.

Arif Sharif Tadvi

Najmuddin Sherkha Tadvi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON

06-05-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

23-12-2025

Evidence

14-10-2025

Evidence

29-08-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

04-04-2024
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 42/2020 - Sumanbai vs. Pirkha The court approved the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under CPC Order 26 Rule 9. The plaintiff owns property (Gut No. 43) in Aurangabad and alleged that adjacent defendants encroached approximately 25 rupees of land. The court appointed TILR Soygaon as Court Commissioner to measure the property and determine the exact encroachment extent, with a report due within one month. The plaintiff was directed to deposit measurement expenses within 15 days and furnish necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 42/2020 - Sumanbai vs. Pirkha The court approved the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under CPC Order 26 Rule 9. The plaintiff owns property (Gut No. 43) in Aurangabad and alleged that adjacent defendants encroached approximately 25 rupees of land. The court appointed TILR Soygaon as Court Commissioner to measure the property and determine the exact encroachment extent, with a report due within one month. The plaintiff was directed to deposit measurement expenses within 15 days and furnish necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case