Sumanbai Bhika Sapkal vs Pirkha Sharif Tadvi Advocate - Mahajan R.S. — 42/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU120004312020
Filing Number
85/2020
Filing Date
12-Aug-2020
Registration No
42/2020
Registration Date
12-Aug-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sumanbai Bhika Sapkal
Adv. Giri R.A.
-
2.Vikas Baburao Borade
Adv. Giri R.A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pirkha Sharif Tadvi Advocate - Mahajan R.S.
-
2.Arif Sharif Tadvi
-
3.Najmuddin Sherkha Tadvi
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
10-Jul-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
28-Mar-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
-
04-Mar-2025
Steps
-
13-Jan-2025
Steps
-
09-Dec-2024
Steps
-
26-Sep-2024
Steps
-
12-Aug-2024
Steps
-
20-Jul-2024
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
-
15-Jun-2024
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
-
04-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 42/2020 - Sumanbai vs. Pirkha The court approved the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under CPC Order 26 Rule 9. The plaintiff owns property (Gut No. 43) in Aurangabad and alleged that adjacent defendants encroached approximately 25 rupees of land. The court appointed TILR Soygaon as Court Commissioner to measure the property and determine the exact encroachment extent, with a report due within one month. The plaintiff was directed to deposit measurement expenses within 15 days and furnish necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2024
Report
-
01-Feb-2024
Dismissal Order
-
15-Jan-2024
Evidence
-
09-Nov-2023
Evidence
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
-
29-Mar-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
16-Jan-2023
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
14-Nov-2022
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
17-Oct-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
17-Oct-2022
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
14-Sep-2022
Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
18-Jul-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
13-Jun-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
24-Mar-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
22-Feb-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
19-Jan-2022
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
13-Nov-2021
List of Witness
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
16-Oct-2021
Dismissal Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
08-Sep-2021
Dismissal Order
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
09-Aug-2021
Ex_Party Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
05-Jul-2021
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
06-May-2021
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
31-Mar-2021
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
15-Mar-2021
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
25-Feb-2021
W.S. and Say
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
19-Jan-2021
Report
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
16-Dec-2020
Report
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
20-Nov-2020
Report
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
19-Oct-2020
Report
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon
-
22-Sep-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2020
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 42/2020 - Sumanbai vs. Pirkha The court approved the plaintiff's application for appointment of a Court Commissioner under CPC Order 26 Rule 9. The plaintiff owns property (Gut No. 43) in Aurangabad and alleged that adjacent defendants encroached approximately 25 rupees of land. The court appointed TILR Soygaon as Court Commissioner to measure the property and determine the exact encroachment extent, with a report due within one month. The plaintiff was directed to deposit measurement expenses within 15 days and furnish necessary documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts