Amedibai Dallu Chavhan vs nill — 156/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,3. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU120003742025

e-Filing Number

01-04-2025

Filing Number

206/2025

Filing Date

01-Apr-2025

Registration No

156/2025

Registration Date

03-Apr-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amedibai Dallu Chavhan

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  2. 2.Sumersing Dallu Chavhan

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  3. 3.Kalpanabai Ramrao Rathod

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  4. 4.Savitabai Raju Rathod

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  5. 5.Sarlabai Dallu Chavhan

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  6. 6.Atmaram Dallu Chavhan

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  7. 7.Latabai Laxman Jadhav

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

  8. 8.Surekha Rajendra Rathod

    Adv. JADHAV AMBADAS VIKRAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.nill

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted the petition filed by Amedibai Dallu Chavhan, Sumersing Dallu Chavhan, and Kalpanabai Ramrao Rathod for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Regulation 1827, Rule 8, Rules 2 and 3. The court recognized all seven petitioners as legitimate heirs of the deceased Dallu Gursal Chavhan (who died on 22.03.2024) and directed that a succession certificate be issued to them after payment of requisite court fees, with no adverse claims from any objector affecting their heirship rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  12. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  14. 14-Jan-2026

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  15. 02-Jan-2026

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  16. 01-Dec-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  17. 12-Nov-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  18. 01-Nov-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  19. 04-Oct-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  22. 04-Jul-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  23. 18-Jun-2025

    Report

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  24. 04-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 04-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 01-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 156/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petition filed by Amedibai Dallu Chavhan, Sumersing Dallu Chavhan, and Kalpanabai Ramrao Rathod for a succession certificate under the Mumbai Regulation 1827, Rule 8, Rules 2 and 3. The court recognized all seven petitioners as legitimate heirs of the deceased Dallu Gursal Chavhan (who died on 22.03.2024) and directed that a succession certificate be issued to them after payment of requisite court fees, with no adverse claims from any objector affecting their heirship rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case