Subhash Sukdeo Patil vs Subhash Dyaram Patil — 116/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU120002782023
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
140/2023
Filing Date
29-03-2023
Registration No
116/2023
Registration Date
29-03-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Sukdeo Patil
Adv. Mahajan R.S.
Respondent(s)
Subhash Dyaram Patil
Sumanbai Subhash Patil
Yogesh Subhash Patil
Pankaj Subhash Patil
Ketan Shivaji Patil
Samir Shivaji Patil
Ashabai Shivaji Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Evidence
Evidence
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Issues |
| 08-12-2025 | Issues |
| 08-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 116/2023 Petitioner: Subhash Sukdeo Patil Respondents: Subhash Dyaram Patil, Sumanbai Subhash Patil, Yogesh Subhash Patil Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor regarding disputed agricultural land in Mokhed, Aurangabad. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding obstruction of a bullock cart path and illegal moneylending transactions, determining that respondents hold valid sale deeds establishing ownership of the contested property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 116/2023 Petitioner: Subhash Sukdeo Patil Respondents: Subhash Dyaram Patil, Sumanbai Subhash Patil, Yogesh Subhash Patil Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor regarding disputed agricultural land in Mokhed, Aurangabad. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding obstruction of a bullock cart path and illegal moneylending transactions, determining that respondents hold valid sale deeds establishing ownership of the contested property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts