Subhash Sukdeo Patil vs Subhash Dyaram Patil — 116/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU120002782023

Filing Number

140/2023

Filing Date

29-Mar-2023

Registration No

116/2023

Registration Date

29-Mar-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subhash Sukdeo Patil

    Adv. Mahajan R.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhash Dyaram Patil

  2. 2.Sumanbai Subhash Patil

  3. 3.Yogesh Subhash Patil

  4. 4.Pankaj Subhash Patil

  5. 5.Ketan Shivaji Patil

  6. 6.Samir Shivaji Patil

  7. 7.Ashabai Shivaji Patil

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  4. 21-Jan-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  8. 12-Jun-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  9. 21-Feb-2025

    Issues

  10. 19-Dec-2024

    Issues

  11. 09-Oct-2024

    Issues

  12. 19-Aug-2024

    Issues

  13. 27-Jun-2024

    Issues

  14. 20-Apr-2024

    Issues

  15. 16-Mar-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: 116/2023 Petitioner: Subhash Sukdeo Patil Respondents: Subhash Dyaram Patil, Sumanbai Subhash Patil, Yogesh Subhash Patil Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor regarding disputed agricultural land in Mokhed, Aurangabad. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding obstruction of a bullock cart path and illegal moneylending transactions, determining that respondents hold valid sale deeds establishing ownership of the contested property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 16-Mar-2024

    Issues

  17. 07-Mar-2024

    Order on Exh

  18. 07-Feb-2024

    Hearing

  19. 31-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  20. 15-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  21. 11-Jan-2024

    Hearing

  22. 16-Dec-2023

    Hearing

  23. 29-Nov-2023

    Hearing

  24. 04-Nov-2023

    Hearing

  25. 23-Oct-2023

    Hearing

  26. 05-Oct-2023

    Hearing

  27. 18-Sep-2023

    Hearing

  28. 30-Aug-2023

    Hearing

  29. 22-Aug-2023

    W.S. and Say

  30. 01-Jul-2023

    W.S. and Say

  31. 04-May-2023

    W.S. and Say

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Soygaon

  32. 29-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 29-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 116/2023 Petitioner: Subhash Sukdeo Patil Respondents: Subhash Dyaram Patil, Sumanbai Subhash Patil, Yogesh Subhash Patil Outcome: The petitioner's application for temporary injunction was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor regarding disputed agricultural land in Mokhed, Aurangabad. The court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding obstruction of a bullock cart path and illegal moneylending transactions, determining that respondents hold valid sale deeds establishing ownership of the contested property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case