Ishwar Soniram Deore vs Raju Zagadu Patil Advocate - Choudhari P.M. — 50/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU120002092021
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
80/2021
Filing Date
28-06-2021
Registration No
50/2021
Registration Date
28-06-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ishwar Soniram Deore
Adv. Mahajan R.S.
Respondent(s)
Raju Zagadu Patil Advocate - Choudhari P.M.
Kaveribai Sanjay Patil
Eknath Ramesh Baviskar
Chudaman Manji Patil (Tejekar)
Raju Manji Patil (Tejekar)
Ishwar Sukhdeo Patil
Ramesh Sukhadeo Gaikwad (Patil)
Ashabai Anna Gaikwad
Lala Suresh Gaikwad
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Galwada (B),
Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Galwada B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 25-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 23-09-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ishwar Deore v. Raju & Others (Civil Suit 50/2021) Outcome: The court partially granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. Defendants are restrained from flowing drainage water into the plaintiff's suit property in Galwada village. However, the prayer to direct defendants to close their house doors was rejected, as encroachment must first be determined through full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ishwar Deore v. Raju & Others (Civil Suit 50/2021) Outcome: The court partially granted the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. Defendants are restrained from flowing drainage water into the plaintiff's suit property in Galwada village. However, the prayer to direct defendants to close their house doors was rejected, as encroachment must first be determined through full trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts