Bank of Maharashtra Branch Wadod Bazar Through Branch Manager Santosh Manohar Bhange vs Sofiyabee Shabbir Shaikh — 8/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU110017432022
Filing Number
203/2022
Filing Date
23-Dec-2022
Registration No
8/2023
Registration Date
07-Jan-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bank of Maharashtra Branch Wadod Bazar Through Branch Manager Santosh Manohar Bhange
Adv. Dhakre S.K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sofiyabee Shabbir Shaikh
-
2.Shabbir S/o Nasir Shaikh
-
3.Faridaee W/o Mosin Shaikh
-
4.Altaf S/o Babu Shaikh
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
23-Apr-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
08-Jan-2026
Arguments
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
18-Dec-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
20-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
30-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
25-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
04-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
10-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
08-May-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
20-Mar-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
27-Feb-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
09-Jan-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: 8/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed; case resolved against the petitioner (Bank of Maharashtra). The court found critical procedural failures by the Bank in its recovery action against the respondents. The bank failed to properly serve notice to the defendants (notice marked "Not Delivered to addressee cannot be located"), did not produce required visit/inspection reports, provided incomplete documentation regarding the loan bonds, and the bank manager admitted under cross-examination to filing false affidavits and giving false testimony. The court rejected the bank's claims due to these substantial lapses in procedure and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2025
Defence Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
05-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
12-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
11-Jul-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
09-May-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
04-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
01-Feb-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
21-Dec-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
26-Oct-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
21-Sep-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
27-Jul-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
15-Jun-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
13-Apr-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
02-Mar-2023
W.S. and Say
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC, Phulambri
-
10-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2023
Case Summary: 8/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed; case resolved against the petitioner (Bank of Maharashtra). The court found critical procedural failures by the Bank in its recovery action against the respondents. The bank failed to properly serve notice to the defendants (notice marked "Not Delivered to addressee cannot be located"), did not produce required visit/inspection reports, provided incomplete documentation regarding the loan bonds, and the bank manager admitted under cross-examination to filing false affidavits and giving false testimony. The court rejected the bank's claims due to these substantial lapses in procedure and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts