Shivaji Baburao Ingle vs State Through Police Station Phulambri — 169/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 28th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU110017022025
e-Filing Number
26-12-2025
Filing Number
1374/2025
Filing Date
29-12-2025
Registration No
169/2025
Registration Date
29-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Phulambri
Judge
1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Phulambri
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivaji Baburao Ingle
Adv. Adv.Ingle Kailas Ukhardu
Respondent(s)
State Through Police Station Phulambri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge JD and JMFC, Phulambri
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shivaji Baburao Ingle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 169/2025) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized vehicle (Ashok Leyland truck) used in illegal cattle transportation. The vehicle was seized in connection with animal cruelty offences under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court granted custody to the vehicle owner upon execution of a Rs. 7,00,000 supurtnama bond with surety, holding the vehicle as security for animal care costs pending trial conclusion, while imposing strict conditions against disposal or identity change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shivaji Baburao Ingle vs. State of Maharashtra (Cri.M.A. 169/2025) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized vehicle (Ashok Leyland truck) used in illegal cattle transportation. The vehicle was seized in connection with animal cruelty offences under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The court granted custody to the vehicle owner upon execution of a Rs. 7,00,000 supurtnama bond with surety, holding the vehicle as security for animal care costs pending trial conclusion, while imposing strict conditions against disposal or identity change. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts